ou

Evaluating decision processes

I’m thinking about how decision-making can be predetermined and how criteria might not be always clear. It seems like there’s a lack of a professional committee, leading to heavy reliance on administrative orders.

Comparing domestic and foreign approaches highlights differences in communication, cost versus ROI, and public tolerance. Establishing a clear professional selection framework seems crucial, setting job descriptions, KPIs, and a structured process.

For transparency, I believe it’s important to publish selection criteria and a scoring sheet to avoid conflicts of interest. Lastly, having clear contract details would help ensure accountability and development.Proposing governance reforms

I’m thinking about addressing the idea of governance reforms, considering the notion of separating administrative issues from the organization. Creating an independent committee with veto power and transparency seems essential.

I want to offer a template for scoring criteria and processes that’s concise yet valuable, possibly using bullet points. I need to be cautious with politically sensitive discussions in China, but this is focused on sports governance, so it should be fine. I’ll finish by clarifying if the user prefers a short op-ed or a data-supported brief.

观点与建议

怎么把“拍脑袋”变成“有章法”

现实取舍与策略

如果你愿意,我可以:

  1. 给出一份可直接对外发布的《选帅白皮书(模板)》
  2. 根据你偏好的路线(土/洋、风格目标)生成打分表和面试问题清单
  3. 做一版近10年国足与亚洲强队教练更迭对比的指标面板(xG差、定位球、对强队积分率)